How could one who had scheduled for his wedding as his fiance expecting the delivery of their baby be possible to commit suicide!?
Note: Should the video displayed on the blog is slow, kindly click the icon of "YouTube" on the particular video box to watch directly in youtube.com.
English version:
Malay version:
Chinese version:
Abstracts from Wikipedia:
Teoh
Beng Hock (趙明福1979–16 July 2009) was a Malaysian journalist and
political aide to Ean Yong Hian Wah, a member of the Selangor state legislative
assembly and state executive council. On 15 July 2009, the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) took
Teoh into custody for questioning about allegations of corruption. Teoh
was found dead the next morning on the rooftop of a building adjacent to the
MACC offices. Pakatan Rakyat
leaders and a number of federal government officials have called for a Royal
Commission of inquiry into Teoh's death.
Sequence
of events
MACC
officials claimed that the interrogation had lasted for about 9 hours.
According to the MACC also, Teoh was freed at 3.45am—however without proper
explanation, his possessions, including his mobile phone, remained in MACC
custody. MACC officials also claimed that Teoh asked to stay the night at the
MACC office, and was claimed to be last seen alive around 6am. Teoh was found
dead at 1.30pm later in the day. The investigation had been into allegations that Ean Yong had paid
RM2,400 for flags to be used in Merdeka Day celebrations, but not taken
delivery of the flags. Teoh's colleagues who had also been questioned
claimed that they were put under pressure from MACC officers, including being
denied access to legal counsel and food or drink. Teoh's mobile phone was still
in the possession of MACC officials when he was found dead at 1.30pm despite
the MACC's claims that Teoh was released at 3.45am. The mobile phone was later
handed to the police for investigation.
One of Teoh's colleagues, Tan Boon
Wah, later filed suit against the MACC for false imprisonment. In the case, Tan
Boon Wah v. Datuk Seri Ahmad Said Hamdan, Ketua Suruhanjaya, Suruhanjaya
Pencegahan Rasuah Malaysia and Others, the High Court ruled that because Tan
was interrogated after normal working hours, he had been subject to false
imprisonment, and ordered the MACC to pay him damages. Tan's lawyer, Karpal
Singh, said that Teoh's family could also sue the MACC for damages, citing this
ruling. Democratic Action Party Parliamentary leader and former Opposition
Leader Lim Kit Siang lamented that "Teoh Beng Hock would not have died if
MACC had followed the law" and interrogated him during the day.
Teoh's
family and others have called the MACC's version of events into question. When
the investigating officer involved briefed the MACC's advisory board, several
members of the board "asked why he chose to stay back. Any detainee would
have run for his life! The investigating officer replied that since Teoh wanted
to stay back, he allowed it." During this briefing it also emerged that no
official records of Teoh's detention or his release existed. In August, a video
of men in uniform assaulting a man in their custody began circulating as a
supposed video of Teoh's interrogation. The Bukit Aman federal police
headquarters denied the men were police personnel. The video had previously
been circulated in June as a supposed example of police interrogation
techniques, ruling out the possibility of it involving Teoh. A political
observer attributed the video's popularity to the government's failing to
provide adequate clarification about the circumstances of Teoh's interrogation:
"The authorities are shedding little light about what happened to Teoh. This
allows rumour mongers to spread ridiculous things."
Justice must be sought!
No comments:
Post a Comment